Someone call the attending physician in the Capitol. The Democratic majority leader has developed another case of foot-in-mouth disease.
In an apparent last-ditch effort to get his multibillion-dollar jobs bill passed, senator and nouveau feminist Harry Reid claimed this week that unemployed men are more likely to beat their wives.
"Men when they're out of work tend to become abusive," said Reid (D-Nev.). "I met with some people while I was home dealing with domestic abuse. It has gotten out of hand. Why? Men don't have jobs. Women don't have jobs either, but women aren't abusive, most of the time. Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive."
So let me get this straight: Every out-of-work couple in America is a paycheck away from turning into a Lifetime television movie, and the only thing that can prevent the jobless male population from channeling Ike Turner is Reid's jobs bill?
Does this mean that Reid, trailing in the polls for reelection, is going to end up slapping his wife around come Nov. 2 when he's likely to be out of work? (Psst, Mrs. Reid, you might want to ask for a Louisville Slugger and some jujitsu classes for your anniversary.)
This is yet another head-scratching observation in a series of puzzling comments made by the senator in the past year.
Reid famously insulted Tea Party protesters by calling them "evil-mongers." He then was quoted as saying that Barack Obama could become the country's first black President because he was "light-skinned" and had "no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one." Now he's moved on to offending half the U.S. population.
The blowback has already begun.
"Sen. Reid's one-sided comments are the latest example how persons slice-and-dice the data to mislead the public," said Marty Nemko of the National Organization for Men. "If Sen. Reid truly wants to help unemployed men, he should stop unfairly vilifying them as abusers and make sure his new jobs bill targets those in greatest need."
Nemko says that there isn't a disparity between genders, pointing out that the police reports used by women's advocacy organizations are misleading because "men are embarrassed to say their wives beat them over the head with a frying pan."
The latest Reid gaffe is being dubbed "abusegate" by Men's News Daily, which quotes California State University Psychology Prof. Martin Fiebert as saying that 250 scholarly studies show women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, in their relationships than are men.
Dr. Keith Ablow, a psychiatrist and author, agrees, arguing that abuse knows no gender distinction.
"Both men and women are more prone to violence when economic stresses are severe. This impacts children, especially. The senator's unfortunate and misinformed comments mistake domestic violence as largely a male issue, which is untrue," Ablow told me during a recent interview.
As the Democratic leader in the Senate, Reid is responsible for crafting and passing legislation that will put Americans back to work. With more than 15 million citizens unemployed, he's failed in this capacity. So under Reid's logic, isn't this alleged uptick in aggression partly his fault?
Let's not forget that though Reid hasn't created the jobs he promised, under his watch the Senate passed $7.36 trillion in bailouts, an $862 billion stimulus bill and now a $15 billion jobs bill. Now that's what I call abuse.
Domestic violence is, no question, a serious issue. But why it's being threaded into a plea for passage of another massive spending bill when the first one (largely similar) didn't work is just plain absurd.
If a woman is with a partner who is punching her because he isn't punching a clock, she should be focused on finding a way out of the relationship, not finding him a job.
Harry Reid needs to quit being a shrink. Better yet, he should quit being a senator.






