About
RSS
<< September, 2009 >>
SMTWTFS
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930
Categories
Archives
In The News
YouTube Videos
Google Ads
22 September 2009
Michelle to the Rescue?

When it comes to selling health care, it's a family affair. As one Obama struggles to sell his plan to the broader public, it appears the White House is hopeful they can enlist another Obama to help close the deal.

According to Politico: First lady Michelle Obama “plans a packed autumn that aides say will include a ‘dedicated focus’ on health insurance reform”.

Up until today, we’ve heard little from the first lady when it comes to hot button issues. They’ve covered her gardening, gabbing with kids, and walking along side her husband to and from Marine One.

Like every first lady, she chose an issue that she wanted to champion during her husband’s tenure. For Michelle Obama, it was military families, a noble and paramount concern. Now, the Obamas plan to tag team the country making healthcare priority number one.

If history is any indication, a president’s wife might not be the best salesperson. Remember what happened the last time a President enlisted his wife to sell healthcare? Hillary Clinton found herself in a national battle, further complicating the issue for Congress, for her husband, and for herself.

Though CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante reports that, “unlike Hillary Clinton who spearheaded the Clinton administration's early health care effort, first lady Michelle Obama will have a very different role in the president's non-stop effort to sell health care reform,” the move still remains dangerous. Sending a popular First Lady into a polarizing debate that is already turned against your favor is a gamble. Especially when that lady wasn’t always so popular.

Before we celebrated her bare arms and J Crew shift dresses, Michelle Obama has had a rocky relationship with the American people. During the campaign, Michelle was often considered a liability for her husband. She was stereotyped as “angry,” called a “militant black woman” on some blogs and most controversially, was caught in the crosshairs over comments about being proud of her country for the first time. Many joked she wore the pants in the relationship, and speculated that she harbored racist feelings toward whites.

Obama worked hard to reform that image. She stayed mostly behind the scenes, insisting she was focused on raising her daughters, not elbowing her way into Oval Office policy making. And it worked. In March 2008, her positive rating was only 32 percent, according to an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll. Now, the first lady boasts an approval rating of 70 percent, much higher than her husband’s.

Dissaproval for the president's healthcare plan is at an all time low. By thrusting her into the most divisive debate the country has had since the Iraq War, The Administration faces a host of risks.

First, they’ll expend the precious political capital that the First Lady has earned from a majority of the American people. If this strategy fails, the Administration risks having two unpopular Obamas at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. They may think she’s their secret weapon, but that weapon could be better used in 2010 and 2012.

Injecting Obama at this stage in the game could also throw gasoline on the race debate. Many on the left have accused anyone who opposes the President of harboring racist feelings. If they oppose both Obamas, will this further fuel the fire?

Society is generally tougher on females in the public eye than males. If Obama's advisers aren't careful, Michelle Obama could return to her lightning rod status and end up being a liability, not an asset, for her husband. She should stick to her original mission: military families, ribbon cuttings, recipes, and People magazine interviews. Helping the families of those on the front line is one thing, helping your president-husband on the front lines is another.

Posted by atantaros at 9:33 AM
09 September 2009
He Just Doesn't Get It

They say that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result.

Someone should have mentioned that to Obama. He gave us nothing new during his ultra-hyped speech on healthcare. After forty-five minutes and a teleprompter on the verge of overheating, he blew it. The President made history convening both Houses of Congress and doled out the same stale speech, from his proposed cuts in Medicare that he refers to as "waste" to tax hikes to fund his plan.

There was one bit of news: an indisputable leftward lurch on the public option that signified not only that he is bound to their demands, but also that he is no Bill Clinton.

Unlike Clinton, Obama tied the public health option to his ankle. And much like a concrete block, he will go down with it. Forty-four moderate Democrats will not vote for the current House bill that includes the public option, enough to deny Pelosi the ability to pass it without Republican support.

To be fair, Obama's opening and closing tone was one of his best yet. But fluffy imperatives that call for us to act, absent of hard facts will not result in a shift in polling. If you had ears but no brain, you would have been moved (Is that why Biden was crying?), but the public is much sharper, particularly when it comes to this issue.

Here's what was missing, besides new material:

No answer on how he can not only expand coverage but also cut costs.

No answer on how private insurance goes down by increasing the costs of insurance

No answer on how to cut the current deficit.

No answer as to why he will cut waste and abuse to help pay for for government run insurance option, but not to help cut the current ballooning deficit.

No answer on how to make medicare solvent.

No answer on why he won't cover illegals, but includes them in his 46 million uninsured count.

No answer on what his plan is for illegals.

No definitive, outcomes based answer on medical malpractice.

No answer on why if this is such an urgent imperative, the plan won't kick in until after he runs for re-election.

Public disapproval of President Barack Obama's handling of health care has leaped to 52 percent, according to Associated Press-GfK poll. At a time when we're running a 7-9 trillion dollar ten year deficit he is talking about adding another trillion to that number, begging the question, why now?

Mr. President, you just don't get it. The healthcare debate ripped your ability to persuade through rhetoric right out of your hands. You needed to give us facts, and you failed. You needed to compromise, and you bucked bi-partisan solutions showcasing the inflexibility of a zealot, and the policies of a hard core liberal.

Though Obama claims "we are back from the brink" it is his Presidency that is on the brink. The brink of collapse.

Follow Andrea on Twitter: @andreatantaros.

Posted by atantaros at 10:44 PM
04 September 2009
A First Day of School Message for Obama: Keep Out of the Classroom
When I was in grade school, if I did a certain number of push-ups, pull-ups and performed the shuttle run in under 10 minutes I received a certificate from the Oval Office. 
 
Apparently squat thrusts and jumping jacks aren’t good enough for Barack Obama. With a video address next week he’s instructing teachers nationwide to assign students a paper on how to "help the president."
 
Among the unprecedented activities the government initially suggested for prekindergarten to sixth-grade students (well, unprecedented except for North Korea and the former Soviet Union): that they "write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president."
 
Another task recommended for students immediately after listening to the speech: to engage in a discussion about what "the president wants us to do." 
 
At least that’s what the first memo said.
 
What happened to Hamlet? Fractions, anyone?
 
The Administration had to quickly walk back those instructions for a more toned-down approach.  Now they’ve moved away from what turned out to be a politically prickly idea and are merely insisting “Obama just wanted to tell the kids to stay in school!”
 
Good thinking. The drop out rate among third graders is really spiraling of control.
 
Obama’s had a rough summer and it’s reflected in his polls.  This is, no doubt, an effort to help remediate his image, but also butt into the lives of our next generation. And he’s called in his base to help: Hollywood. Apparently when the going gets tough, the tough call…Ashton and Demi? A video has been cut entitled “I Pledge” and one school principal is taking heat for showing the footage at an assembly program. (To see the video visit FOXNews.com).
 
It features several celebrities designed to act as moral compasses for the kids. Names like Courtney Cox, Cameron Diaz  – figures that many kids idolize – are featured pledging what they can to help the President. For instance, end world hunger, not give people "the finger" and uh, smile more.  
 
Nothing says real sacrifice like a toothy grin.
 
The White House is crossing a very fine line with its video message to kids. It's one thing to talk about the President's duties; it's another to create a program that, by design, forces children to ponder his or her wonderfulness. Students should know who the President is and what his powers are – that’s called civics class – but they shouldn't be discussing what he wants them to do. It reeks of propaganda and a cult of personality taken to the extreme. It also sets a precedent. Will the commander-in-chief use this mechanism going forward to reach potential new voters to push his agenda?
 
Opening the door to the federal government getting involved in local schools equals politicization. It’s the parents’ job and the role of teachers to help set educational goals, not the Executive Branch of government. But Barack Obama, at his core, is a nanny state leftist, indoctrinated in the progressive radicalism that believes big government knows best.
 
From the stimulus to Cash for Clunkers to the bailouts, the Administration has screwed up enough in the last nine months; our kids won't be next.  But maybe that's why he's speaking to them. With the American electorate skeptical of his policies, he needs to address people who really were born yesterday. 
 
Follow me on Twitter @andreatantaros.
Posted by atantaros at 7:33 AM
02 September 2009
Obama Must Lose the Left or Lose Big

In August, 2007 Senator Barack Obama said in an interview that he had the capacity to unify the country and move it out of what he called "ideological gridlock."

"I think it is fair to say that I believe I can bring the country together more effectively than she can," Obama said (referring to Hillary Clinton).

Fast forward to 2009. We've seen nothing like that rosy picture that was painted by the then presidential hopeful. In that, it's all been evidence to the contrary. Since taking office, it seems Obama has been more focused on advancing his leftist ideology than bi-partisan brokering. And what does that do? It further divides -- not unites -- the electorate. 

The president has spent his summer straddling the fence on a public option for his health care overhaul, he's vacillated over whether or not we're in a War on Terror, remains vague about where he stands on prosecuting the CIA and hasn't articulated a clear position on Afghanistan.

President Obama knows that by spelling out where he stands on each one of these topics, he'll light up the left -- something he seems to want desperately to avoid. But he can't do it much longer. This consistent inconsistency has rendered him incompetent when it comes to convincing the country to have confidence in him and he has polarized the nation by triggering unprecedented levels of anger by his actions. The fury is most present in the voting block Obama needs the most: independents.

The numbers aren't pretty. According to Rasmussen Reports, when it comes to health care among those not affiliated with either major party, 55 percent oppose the legislation. That includes 47 percent of independents who strongly oppose it.

Fifty-four percent of voters not affiliated with either party are opposed to the investigation of the CIA. And, most damaging for the White House are the president's overall approval ratings with independents: a lackluster 38 percent. 

Then, there's the number one issue that matters most to independents: the ballooning deficit. Obama has completely lost control of his fiscal message, further polarizing the nation. 

The deeper the divide grows, the harder it will be for him to accomplish anything on his agenda.

Threatened with the growing consensus that Obama just isn't capable of leading the Democratic Party in a direction that will allow them to remain in power, the president might be getting the message. According to a recent report by Politico:

"Obama is considering detailing his health-care demands in a major speech as soon as next week, when Congress returns from the August recess. And although House leaders have said their members will demand the inclusion of a public insurance option, Obama has no plans to insist on it himself, the officials said."

(Cue record-scratching sound).

After the political equivalent of "Who's on First," is Obama finally adopting the age-old presidential adage: you can screw your base and they won't budge? (Where else are they going to go?) Or is this more of a grey area, triangulating at its best, that will put him at odds with Pelosi and many congressional Democrats?

Like Clinton, his new strategy might entail curbing the kowtowing to the left with a move to the middle. The question is: will it be too late? Unlike Clinton, Obama doesn't have an economy on the rise, or the foil of a Republican-led Congress. -- His numbers are also lower than Clinton's were at this time in his tenure, making it more difficult to rebound.

If he doesn't boot his base soon and concentrate on winning back trust with key voting blocks like independents, he can expect a continued free fall in his approval ratings. And like Clinton, he'll soon get a Republican Congress. That's the thing about the restart button. If you don't hit it, the American people will do it for you.

Posted by atantaros at 3:42 PM
Designed and Maintained by Strategic Solutions